| Αρχική | | | Προφίλ | | | Θέματα | | | Φιλοσοφική ματιά | | | Απόψεις | | | Σπουδαστήριο | | | Έλληνες | | | Ξένοι | | | Επιστήμες | | | Forum | | | Επικοινωνία | 
| Moral Attitudes for Expressivists | |
| Συγγραφέας: Tristram McPherson Tristram McPherson: Moral Attitudes for Expressivists (pdf, 12 pages) Metaethical expressivism takes moral utterances to express non-cognitive attitudes in just the same way that ordinary factual utterances express belief.1 In doing so, it promises to solve  three  central  metaethical  problems  at  a  stroke.  First,  it  avoids  the  worry  (most famously  expressed  by  Mackie  1977)  that  moral  facts  and  properties  would  be unacceptable  additions  to  our  ontology.  Second,  it  promises  to  explain  the  seemingly close  relation  between  one’s  judging  that  one  ought  morally  to  !  and  one’s  having  a motive to ! by understanding the attitude expressed as ‘conative’, i.e. as an intrinsically motivating  desire-like  state.2  Finally,  and  perhaps  most  importantly,  expressivism promises  a  solution  to  the  univocality  problem,  the  problem  of  explaining  how  people with  systematically  different  ethical  views  are  nevertheless  concerned  with  a  common topic. Attempts to substantively explain intuitions of ethical agreement and disagreement between parties in terms of their employment of co-referring ethical concepts have faced a series of counterexamples. Expressivism understands univocality in terms of agreement and disagreement in non-cognitive attitude, thus circumventing the need to characterize a univocal cognitive content.3 Expressivism  itself  faces  two  central  explanatory  challenges.  Most  famously,  the expressivist  needs  to  solve  the  so-called  ‘Frege-Geach  problem’:  to  explain  why  moral beliefs and moral statements seem to have much the same sort of logical and inferential properties  as  ordinary  factual  beliefs  and  statements.4  Much  less  famously,  the expressivist faces the challenge of specifying what sort of attitude is expressed by moral utterances.  This  task,  dubbed  the  ‘moral  attitude  problem’  by  Alexander  Miller  (2003, 43), has received surprisingly little attention compared with that lavished on the Frege- Geach  problem.  However,  solving  this  problem  is  a  central  and  non-trivial  task  for  the expressivist program in metaethics: the truth of expressivism requires some answer to this question,  and  a  recent  paper  by  David  Merli  (2008)  suggests  that,  besides  its  intrinsic..... | |
|  | |





 
			